
Sunday morning along with thousands of Journalists of Color, I had an opportunity to hear “live” from Presumptive Democratic candidate Barack Obama.
This appearance was broadcast live on “Late Edition with Wolf Blitzer” and was the first public appearance following Senator Obama’s overseas trip to the Middle East and Europe. The event was featured at UNITY: Journalists of Color conference held in Chicago. The forum was moderated by CNN correspondent Suzanne Malveaux and TIME magazine deputy editor Romesar Ratnesar.
The presumptive Republican nominee, John McCain was also invited to appear however was unable to be present due to schedule conflicts. Highlighted excerpts courtesy of CNN’s “Late Edition with Wolf Blitzer” are listed below:
Highlighted Excerpts:
On criticism of Sen. Obama’s world trip
MALVEAUX: Senator, I want to use a word that you love to use, “audacity.” A lot of people looked at the trip and they saw the palaces, the world leaders, the 200,000 that were gathered in Berlin, and they said, “The audacity of this trip, it looks like he is running for president of the world.” And a lot of people looked and they want to know, what out of this trip did you take away that you feel makes you a stronger candidate to be a leader here?
OBAMA: Well, let me make a couple points. First of all, I basically met with the same folks that John McCain met with after he won the nomination. He met with all these leaders. He also added a trip to Mexico, a trip to Canada, a trip to Colombia, and nobody suggested that that was “audacious.” I think people assumed that what he was doing was… (APPLAUSE) … talk to world leaders who we may have deal with should we become president. That’s part of the job that I’m applying for. And so — so I was puzzled by this notion that somehow what we were doing was in any way different from what Senator McCain or a lot of presidential candidates have done in the past. Now, I admit we did it really well.
But that shouldn’t be a strike against me. You know, if I was bumbling and fumbling through this thing, I would have been criticized for that. And so — so that’s point number one. I don’t know the political effect of this when I come back. You know, I think people are worried about gas prices; they’re worried about job security; they’re worried about their retirement fund, as the stock market goes down.
So probably a week of me focusing on international issues doesn’t necessarily translate into higher poll numbers here in the United States, because people are understandably concerned about the immediate effects of the economy. And that’s what we will be talking about for the duration. I do think that, in terms of me governing, being an effective president, that that trip was helpful, because I think I’ve established relationships and a certain bond of trust with key leaders around the world who have taken measure of my positions and how I operate and I think can come away with some confidence that this is somebody I can deal with.
On immigration
DIANNE SOLIS, DALLAS MORNING NEWS/NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HISPANIC JOURNALISTS: Hi, I’m Dianne Solis. I’m from the Dallas Morning News and the National Association of Hispanic Journalists. And my question is about immigration. Percentage-wise, the U.S. has nearly as many immigrants as it did at its last historic high about a century ago. So should we have more immigration or less immigration? And where should people come from, particularly given that the biggest backlogs are out of Latin America and Asia for legal entry?
OBAMA: Well, you know, I think that we are a nation of immigrants and we are a nation of laws. And the problem that I see is not the number of immigrants that are coming in — because we actually are advantaged in the United States by the number of immigrants coming in. The Europeans, they’ve got the opposite problem. Because they don’t have a history of assimilating immigrants, they’re actually losing population rapidly. And that could present a huge problem for them, in terms of their economy over the long term. Same thing is true with Japan. So the fact that we’re getting people who still want to come to this country and live out the American dream, that’s all good.
The problem is when we’ve got a legal immigration system running parallel with an illegal immigration system. And I have said that I’m strongly in favor of a comprehensive immigration approach.
On denouncing false rumors that Sen. Obama is a Muslim
LEONARD PITTS, MIAMI HERALD/NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BLACK JOURNALISTS: Good morning, Senator. Leonard Pitts, Jr., columnist with the Miami Herald and member of the National Association of Black Journalists. You have repeatedly denounced false rumors that you are a Muslim.
My question and what I’m wondering is whether or not you feel that you have gone too far, whether or not, in answering these questions without challenging the implicit assumption that there’s something wrong with being a Muslim, you have actually done harm to the cause of Muslims.
You have visited churches and synagogues. When will you — or is it in the plans for you to visit a mosque?
OBAMA: Well, Leonard, I have to say, this is a classic example of a no-win situation, right? So I try to correct something that is false and then people say, “Well, why are you correcting this thing in a way that isn’t sufficiently” — well, let me put it this way.
First of all, I have repeatedly on various occasions said I am not a Muslim, but this whole strategy of suggesting that I am is indicative of anti-Muslim sentiment that we have to — that we have to fight against. So maybe you haven’t seen those quotes, but they’re out there. And I’ve said them on more than one occasion. And I’ve said them on television; I’ve said them in print.
I just don’t like the idea of somebody falsely identifying my religion. I suspect that you wouldn’t appreciate that, either. If you were a Muslim and somebody consistently said you were a Christian, I suspect that you would want to have that corrected, because that’s offensive to — to your faith.
Affirmative Action
JOHN YANG, NBC NEWS/ASIAN AMERICAN JOURNALISTS ASSOCIATION: Thank you, Senator. I’m John Yang, NBC News White House correspondent and a member of the Asian American Journalists Association.
I’d like to ask you about affirmative action. Just this morning, Senator McCain endorsed an Arizona ballot initiative that would end preferences based on race and gender in that state. The author of that initiative, Ward Connerly, says your very success undercuts the argument for affirmative action.
If the United States were to have a president of color, would there still be a need for affirmative action?
OBAMA: Well, look, I am a strong supporter of affirmative action when properly structured so that it is not just a quota, but it is acknowledging and taking into account some of the hardships and difficulties that communities of color may have experienced, continue to experience, and it also speaks to the value of diversity in all walks of American life. We are becoming a more diverse culture, and it’s something that has to be acknowledged.
I’ve also said that affirmative action is not going to be the long-term solution to the problems of race in America, because, frankly, if you’ve got 50 percent of African-American or Latino kids dropping out of high school, it doesn’t really matter what you do in terms of affirmative action. Those kids are not getting into college.
And, you know, there have been times where I think affirmative action has been viewed as a shortcut to solving some of these broader, long-term structural problems.
I also think that we have to think about affirmative action and craft it in such a way where some of our children who are advantaged aren’t getting more favorable treatment than a poor white kid who’s struggled more. That has to be taken into account.
So I think that, whether it’s in terms — particularly, when it comes to college admissions, what I’m interested in is programs that take a wide range of issues into account.
They — I think a university or a college should be able to take into account race, but they should also be able to take into account class, and hardship, and difficulty in making assessments about whether or not a young person is deserving of — of opportunity.
I am disappointed, though, that John McCain flipped and changed his position. I think in the past he had been opposed to these kinds of Ward Connerly referenda or initiatives as divisive. And I think he’s right. You know, the truth of the matter is, these are not designed to solve a big problem, but they’re all too often designed to drive a wedge between people.
And one thing that I’m absolutely convinced about, after having traveled all across the world over the last — last week, is that one of our greatest strengths is the fact that we come from so many different places, and yet we are all Americans.
The Iraqis and the Afghans, when we talked — when they talked to me about our military, not only were they impressed with how effective our military was, but they were also impressed with the fact that we had people from all walks of life who looked different all joining together as Americans.
They were impressed with the fact that our main commanding officer now in Iraq is an African-American. That, I think, is what makes America special. And we shouldn’t lose that — we shouldn’t either lose that or see that as a source of division. It should be a source of pride. And when properly structured, affirmative action, I think, can be a part of that.
What are your views on Senator Obama’s ability to handle the requirements of foreign policy?
Have they changed based on his recent overseas trip to the Middle East and Europe?
Do you support Senator Obama’s view of affirmative action if properly structured?
How do you feel about Ward Connerly’s (author of Arizona affirmative action ballot initiative endorsed by Senator McCain) view that Senator Obama’s success undercuts the need for affirmative action?
Post your comments!